ü Reflect on the contrasting articles
written by Winner & Hetland and Burchenal et al.
· Which perspective do you find most
persuasive?
· How does it support your own
beliefs about the role/strengths of art education?
I think “Art for Our Sake” by Winner
and Hetland is more persuasive to me. However, the second article is not
totally contradictory to the first one. But I really love the statement that
“As schools cut time for the arts, they may be losing their ability to produce
not just the artistic creators of the future, but innovative leaders who
improve the world they inherit. And by continuing to focus on the arts' dubious
links to improved test scores, arts advocates are losing their most powerful
weapon: a real grasp of what arts bring to education.”
“Why Do We Teach Arts in the
Schools?” support the idea that art education can truly develop students’
ability such as math and writing that can help to make them get higher scores
in tests. They used the VTS as an example. However, I agree with what Winner
and Hetland said: “art program teach a specific set of thinking skills rarely
addressed elsewhere in the curriculum—and that far from being irrelevant in a
test-driven education system, art education is becoming even more important as
standardized tests like the MCAS exert a narrowing influence over what schools
teach.” Actually, VTS can do much more than improve the test scores. VTS can
also teach students “studio habits of mind” according to Winner’s article. VTS
is about observation, innovation through exploration, reflection and
expression. So I think we should treat art education in both sides, but cannot
only treat it merely a tool of improving the scores.
“For students living in a rapidly
changing world, the arts teach vital modes of seeing, imagining, inventing, and
thinking.” Art should be used to restore balance and depth to an education
system increasingly skewed toward readily testable skills and information. The
purpose of both articles is good: schools should not cut the time for art,
every student deserve to receive art education.
Both articles made good points. I think the point of contention is that VTS research HAS shown through research that art discussions impact impact student performance in other disciplines and that we in the arts shouldn't be ashamed of that. Still, we walk a fine line in stating that and ensuring that art is included in the curriculum, not because of what it can do for other content area achievement but for its own sake.
ReplyDelete